Saturday, May 26, 2007

my computers

I'm feeling nostalgic. So maybe I should try to list down those computers I've used or owned. I miss my computers!

An apple ][ clone: BASIC, call 151, ProDOS copy II plus. In particular, a key feature of ProDOS vs. DOS 3.3 was directory support. Obviously i didn't know why would'd need directories on those ~160K floppy disks.
XT
386SX: It was SX because it was a partial 32bit chip. Probably 32bit cpu, but 16bit bus.
386DX-66: Something like this. I didn't really use those machines that much, because I was in a different city.
For a year or so I actually didn't own or have access any personal computer. It's hard to imagine that now.
cliff.mit.edu: My first linux. Also the first one with a name.
westlake.mit.edu
quickstation.mit.edu: The hostname is a play on those public quickstations.
a celeron 300 overclocked to 450
unstable - my first dual cpu
heaven - this was another thinkpad i used at grad school
a 17in powerbook
greece: actually a buffalo file server.

Some other machines I also miss:
Those SGI's in W20. now I'm working on a campus where those machines were designed.
I also like the underground cluster near Hayden.
I wonder if I can still login as 'root' to those machines these days.

my first linux

When chatting with H last week, I wondered where B is up to these days. He should have received his phd by now. So I googled him and found that he's become an assistant prof at NUS.

B installed the first ever linux distribution on my P133 dell during duing my freshman winter break. Redhat didn't even existed then. It was Slackware.
At that time, installing Linux was a non-trivial effort. I'm not sure whether SIPB supported it back then. I remember he had to do something with the fonts to start X.

I named that machine "cliff.mit.edu". I still remember its IP was something like 18.239.*.*. (We got the entire class B in a dorm. )
'cliff' had since accompanied me through all the years at college and grad schools. It had become a server after a few years, and at some point it had uptime more than a year.

The P133, 128MB (?), ~4GB HD hardware had to retire at some point. I also lost the hostname after i graduated. But the 'spirit' still lived on. I had since named my office machine 'cliff'.

I first met B when he went back to high school to talk about life at MIT. It was a 'dream', at that time.

Sunday, May 13, 2007

法治?

很多人說,比起大陸,香港剩下所余無幾的優勢之一就是法治。
也很不少人說他們不願意到大陸工作就是對大陸政府機關不信任。

可是我逐漸覺得香港其實也是在五十部笑百部吧。而且某些方面,可能已經遠不如大陸了。

至全世界第一單因用BT被判後,最近又有人不幸因‘貼連接’而被付款五千大元. 在大陸,只要不自己搞色情網站,不貼文泄露國家機密,那麼還是可以安心上網,不用怕突然一天給抓去然後被安個不只所謂罪名吧。

在香港,只要你有錢有關係有勢力,甚麼 高買,內部交易,貪污,踢的士,等等都不要緊,都可以 找人頂罪/讓政府不檢控/請資深大律師打掉官司。
如果你是只是普通市民,就會隨時變成犧牲品,讓政府拿來‘殺一儆百’了。

我很不明白那些整天推崇言論自由的政黨為甚麼不出來評擊政府,為甚麼不上街? 也許他們覺得大部分選民都不上網,上網的也不懂貼連接,所以就懶的理吧。 又也許他們是怕人家誤以為他們支持色情貼圖吧? 因為,他們就算整天在家看四仔,對外也要說色情、盜版都是邪惡的吧。

香港就是一個虛偽的社會吧。不只是那些‘政客’,甚至大部分傳媒,其實也是一樣。這次也看不到生果報有寫出甚麼評論。(也許還需要點耐性吧)

最近那個情色報事件,最有力的反擊還是要出自‘草根’。
投訴聖經大行動

Friday, May 11, 2007

where do you want to be?

Some coworker asked:
If you can choose to be anywhere in this world, where would you be?
My instinct response was "Hong Kong". But there's an alternative:
A place in this universe with most advanced civilization, in both technology (so that I can visit back earth easily) and morality (so that they won't put me in their zoo).
So I guess that question has an assumption that's physically impossible (unless you believe in wormhole or magic).

Thursday, May 10, 2007

那位【電子大王】大概没是没有看過‘乱’吧,不然就不會那麼早就把上市公司都讓給子女了,以至臨死前那幾年要受子女氣,然後過世後讓那些不孝子女跑出來告訴大家他如何教導無方。

生果報:
據 龐 稱 , 王 遭 兒 女 棒打 鴛 鴦 , 甚 至 威 脅 斷 絕 關 係 , 與 兒 女 的 關 係 陷 決 裂 邊 緣 , 仍 敢 與 他 們 對 質 , 為 何 未獲 派 發 股 息 , 又 責 兒 子 沒 好 好 與 龐 溝 通 , 曾 懇 求 兒 女 讓 他 與 龐 一 起 , 共 度 餘 生 。
最 後 , 王 不 悅 兒 女 的 「 所 作 所 為」 , 包 括 不 准 他 干 涉 及 動 用 為 子 孫 而 設 的 信 託 基 金 , 又 要 他 及 龐 簽 署 文 件 , 內 容 包括 限 制 龐 的 月 薪 , 以 及 若 他 去 世 後 , 要 龐 在 七 日 內 搬 出 單 位 , 終 引 致 他 到 律 師 行 ,簽 署 遺 囑 , 將 遺 產 遺 贈 龐 , 觸 發 爭 產 訴 訟 。

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

bias?

【 本 報 訊 】 「 鴨 吧 」 年 輕 男 公 關 與 年 長 廿 載 女 富 商 相 戀 , 獲 她 供 飲 供 食 , 又 不 時 免 費 遊 埠 , 男 公 關 卻 不 心 足 , 詐 騙 對 方 80 萬 元 , 更 威 嚇 要 抖 出 兩 人 關 係 , 勒 索 100 萬 。 區 域 法 院 法 官 昨 判 刑 時 直 斥 被 告 行 為 卑 鄙 、 可 恥 , 令 到 女 事 主 眾 目 睽 睽 下 重 述 羞 於 啓 齒 的 案 情 , 造 成 精 神 壓 力 , 須 判 阻 嚇 刑 罰 入 獄 4 年 。

我有一點點懷疑,如果這案的男女倒轉,是女公關跟男
富商,也會判這個“阻嚇 刑罰” 嗎?也許 ‘男富商’就不會那麼 ‘羞於啓齒’, 沒有那麼多精神壓力了。